Is anyone else getting Russian spam, or is it because I have my name published on Russian websites?
The information center for WebSphere Message Broker v6.1 was updated last week. Here are the links to the latest information centers:
When you do a search using Google for WMB documentation, you are likely to get hits in the v6.0 message center, ensure the url contains v6r1m0 rather than v6r0m0 like the following if you want v6.1 docs:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v6r1m0/index.jsp
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
You can run a fully featured 90 day trial of WebSphere Message Broker v6.1 from here.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
I’ve just spent the last week on a course to learn some skills that should be pretty useful in the fairly near future. The first two days were a course covering HTML, CSS and Javascript. The HTML side was revision really. I’ve been playing with HTML for quite a long time, and even more recently as a technical author. I’ve also dabbled with CSS and JavaScript in this role, although to a much lesser extent. Fortunately I do play a lot with Actionscript in Flash, so the JavaScript stuff at least makes some sense. The final three days covered ‘ajax’ – looking in more depth at javascript, interacting with the server and looking at a couple of toolkits – the prototype toolkit and dojo.
I’ve had lots of people I work with raving about Dojo, but from the little play I had before with it, I wasn’t that impressed. Although to be fair it makes a lot more sense now. Certainly it seems pretty powerful, but then it really should be for a 15MB sized library of javascript files. I’m still not entirely convinced by it though.. I found some of the widget behaviour was rather strange and I was very unimpressed with the documentation. I did like the simplicity of the event handling and xhr request/reply though.
Having a quick look at the other toolsets out there, mootools does look rather interesting. And this is built on the protoptype toolkit which I did actually quite like.
I’ve recently acquired a new domain, so I’m intending to have a play with javascript to build a new website. Although I have to admit, I still haven’t seen anything I can do which wouldn’t be a lot nicer and simpler in Flash. The week has really reinforced for me the fact that Flash really is a very cool and very powerful tool. And I probably need to update my version too.. I bet there is some cool new functionality I’m missing! Yikes, I’m starting to sound like a developer!
Posted in work | Tagged actionscript, ajax, dojo, education, flash, html, javascript, mootools, prototype, tools, web2.0 | 2 Comments »
I’ve recently got back from the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 Plenary meeting in Berlin. In case you don’t understand the acronym, this is a meeting of the Software and systems engineering sub-committee of the International Standards Organisation. SC7 and it’s working groups meet twice a year, with the Plenary held in May, and working group meetings held in the autumn. Being an international organisation, the meetings are held in different places across the world, to enable members to be able to travel to the meetings.
This year the Plenary was in held in Berlin.
I am part of working group 2 – Software Systems Documentation. This is the longest surviving working group in SC7, and works on developing ISO standards for software and systems engineering documentation. We have active members from Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, UK, and the USA. The current main focus of the working group is a suite of standards aimed at different roles in the development and supply of user documentation:
- Requirements for designers and developers of user documentation
- Requirements for testers and assessors of user documentation
- Requirements for suppliers and acquirers of user documentation
- Requirements for managers of user documentation
I am in fact the editor for the standard on requirements for testers and assessors of user documentation. This standard covers the processes involved in testing and validating your user documentation, including documentation review and usability testing. Because of this work, I am also a liaison from working group 2 to working group 26, which is a new working group on software testing. This group is working on a testing standard in three parts, one of which focuses on the documentation which should be produced during testing of a software product such as test plans.
We had a very successful meeting in Berlin, with good progress made on all the projects, and discussion of some future and potential future projects. Here is the team at last year’s Plenary meeting in Moscow:
Posted in usability, work, writing | Tagged berlin, documentation, iso, sc7, software, standards, testers, testing, usability | Leave a Comment »










